Monday, June 25, 2012

The Hawks Blog: Grading the 2011-2012 Season (Jannero Pargo)


*Team/NBA Leaderboard ranks are qualified players only.
*The Floor Time section includes both qualified and unqualified players in rankings.
*Remember to check the Glossary at the end of this entry for stat/abbreviation explanations. 


PG Jannero Pargo (1st season with Hawks/8th overall/Played 08-09 in Europe/Missed 10-11 due to injury)
Age: 32
Draft History: Undrafted in 2002
Acquired: Signed as free agent December of 2011
2012 Salary: $1.22 Million
2013 Contract Status: Free agent
2012 Regular Season Grade: C+

Grade Explanation: Minimum salary, was decent backup PG when Hinrich out. Good outside shooting and FT shooting. Had some very good games off bench. Missed 10 games with appendectomy. Often outmatched when going up against better players. Doesn’t help much when not shooting well. 

Overall: Considering that he missed all of the previous season due to injury; was signed 7 days before the start of the season; and made the minimum for an 8-year player; Pargo was solid in his role as a backup point guard. In fact, he was probably better than should have been expected. He played in 50 of 66 games, all off the bench, averaging 13.4 MPG. He shot .415/.384/.950 and averaged 5.6 P/G, 1.5 R/G, 1.9 A/G, and 0.4 S/G with 1.0 TOV/G.  

As I wrote in an earlier entry, there were times where I felt like Larry Drew kept Pargo in the game too long, but that’s not really Pargo’s fault. In those cases, I felt like Drew was asking Pargo to play outside of his role. The reason that sticking with Pargo can be a problem is that if he’s not hitting from outside he doesn’t really do much to help. While he is fairly quick, he has trouble sticking with guys defensively and his size doesn’t help him on that end. Whether he guards the opposing PG (often not quite quick enough) or shooting guard (usually not big enough) he’s frequently going to struggle. 

Pargo is strictly a jump shooter.  He can create his own shot, but it’s always from outside (95% of JP’s FG attempts were jumpers). He’s not a great distributor either. He’s a point guard in that he can be the main guy dribbling the ball up court and starting the play, but he’s not going to break guys down or dazzle anyone with his passing. 

Overall, Pargo was out-produced by his counterpart on the floor this season, but as stated in Jeff Teague’s season review, Hawks PG’s are not as big a part of the offense as the PG’s of many other teams are. And Pargo played almost exclusively at the point position. When he was at SG he was dramatically out played by his counterpart, but he only played the 2-position for 1% of the Hawks total 2-guard minutes (overall, Pargo was on the floor for about 20% of the team’s total minutes). 

To be clear, Pargo is a reserve type player. But if the main job of the reserve is simply to not hurt the team, he fulfilled expectations. The Hawks were +3.1 per 48 minutes with him on the court, and +3.4 with him off the court (so they were better in terms of net point differential when he wasn’t in the game, but not by much). 

Atlanta’s offensive points per 100 possessions was 4.9 lower when Pargo was on the floor than when he was off the court. This doesn’t surprise too much, because Pargo was normally in the game with the other bench players, and the Hawks didn’t have a lot of offense coming off the bench this season. Also Pargo was playing PG a lot of the time, and as we already covered, that’s not ideal, especially if he’s not hitting his shots. 

On the other hand, JP had a -5.3 ON/OFF DPHP, meaning the Hawks defensive points per 100 possessions number was 5.3 better when Pargo was on the floor than when he was off it. This is interesting, since—as we already covered—Pargo can be a bit of a liability on defense. But again, just as Pargo often played with other bench guys, he was frequently playing against bench guys as well.  If we can make anything of these stats for a guy like Pargo—who was 11th on the team in total minutes—it’s probably this: while he may not have helped the team much when he was in the game, he didn’t hurt the team much either.  

I’ve mentioned a few times how I felt like there were instances where Drew stuck with Pargo too long. Those types of things—sticking with bench players too long—almost never happen in crunch time. Pargo was on the court for just 7% of the Hawks’ CLUTCH minutes (reminder: CLUTCH defined as less than 5 minutes remaining in 4th quarter or overtime with neither team ahead by more than 5 points). 

During that brief amount of time, he scored 7 points, which works out to a P/48 that is higher than his overall number, but to borrow a baseball phrase, it’s a small sample size. He was 3 for 11 from the floor (2 for 10 on J’s) which works out to a .273 FG%, down from his .417 overall shooting percentage during the season. Pargo hit his only FTA and had 1 assist against 2 turnovers during CLUTCH. But again, he wasn’t out there much in CLUTCH. 

As far as being a backup point guard and an outside shooting option, Pargo did his job when healthy. He was an important piece early on when Kirk Hinrich was on the shelf. Eventually his solid work led to him being a fixture in the rotation even after Hinrich returned. His good season was interrupted by injury but he was solid again upon his return. On the whole Pargo had a good year. 

Statistics: I said earlier that Pargo was probably better for the Hawks this year than should have been expected. I wrote that because statistically this was Pargo’s best season in years in a lot of areas, and in some ways it was the best of his career. Pargo established career highs in FG% (.415), PER (13.69), TS% (53.9), EFG (.520), and WS/48 (.095). His .384 3PT% was the 2nd best of his career. 

JP’s P/48, R/48, and A/48 were all up this season from his last year in the league (09-10). In terms of per 48 minutes production, Pargo had the best rebounding season of his career and the 2nd best assist season of his career (best since 05-06). 

Floor Time Stats/Team Rankings (Unqualified)

MIN%: 20% (11th)       
+/- Per 48: +3.1 (8th)
ON/OFF 48: -0.4 (8th)
+/- W-L-T: 25-22-3
WIN%: 53.2 (8th)
ON/OFF OPHP: -4.9 (14th)
ON/OFF DPHP: -5.3 (3rd)
ON/OFF NPHP: +0.4 (8th)


Team Leaderboard: Pargo was 2nd on the team in 3PM/G (1.1) and 3PA/G (2.8). 

He was 3rd on the team in 3PM (53). 


NBA Leaderboard: Here are Pargo’s NBA Leaderboard appearances. 

3PT% (41st)


Season Review: As stated earlier, Pargo played a key role early on when Hinrich was unavailable. Pargo played in the first 19 games of the season, averaging nearly 12 minutes per game. His playing time was more sporadic in February and March as Hinrich returned from injury, but he often stayed in the game longer because he really heated up from behind the arc. In 13 games from February 20th through March 16th, Pargo played 15.7 MPG and averaged 8.3 P/G, while going 24 for 49 on 3-point tries (.490). 

Even after Hinrich came back Pargo remained a key player due to injuries that slowed Joe Johnson and forced him to miss some games, as well as Willie Green being out for an extended period. Also, when Hinrich began starting as part of a 3-guard lineup, Pargo was needed again as the main backup PG. 

Unfortunately, just when Pargo was playing his best basketball in years he was forced to undergo an appendectomy which caused him to miss the final 10 games of March. When he returned, Larry Drew got him right back into the rotation playing a decent amount. 

Actually, this was the point in the season when I thought Drew left Pargo in too long at times, but in fairness, Drew was trying to give the starters some rest and get Pargo back to normal shape before the playoffs. Pargo played in the first 11 games of April until sitting the final game of the year, averaging 17.3 MPG, which was his most playing time of any point in the season. He played pretty well upon his return from injury, though his 3-pt shooting did cool off. 


2012 Postseason Grade: C-


Grade Explanation: Did not help much. Played just 5 seconds over the final 2 games. Did nothing in game 2 and was awful in overtime loss in game 3. Contributed in game 1. Played pretty well in 1st half of game 4 when it was still theoretically in doubt. His poor play in garbage time doesn’t factor in here. But I can’t kill Pargo for not doing much in this series, as he didn’t get many opportunities. 

Statistical: Pargo played in 5 of 6 playoff games against the Celtics, averaging 9.2 MPG off the bench. He shot just .286 from the floor and .333 from 3-pt range. He never went to the line. Pargo averaged 3.2 P/G, 1.0 R/G, 1.2 A/G, and 0.4 S/G with 0.6 TOV/G during the playoffs. 

Pargo played just 46 total minutes in the series (12th out of 13 on the team), with a 7.20 PER (9th), 0.0 WS (10th), and -0.023 WS/48 (10th). Those numbers look horrid, but it’s easy to get weird numbers when you’re talking about less than a full NBA game’s worth of time on the floor. He had a -26 +/- number for the series (12th) and his +/- W-L record in 5 appearances was 0-4-1. Remember, +/- numbers in individual games and in series can be skewed, but those numbers would make some sense, considering he didn’t shoot well, he’s not a distributor, and there were few players on the opposition that he could effectively guard. 

Postseason Review: Pargo didn’t play a major role in the Hawks’ playoff series against Boston. He played just 46 total minutes and 21 of those came in the blowout loss in game 4. He barely played at all in the final 2 games (did not play in game 5; played just 5 seconds in game 6). He did do some good things in game 1 and early in game 4, but he wasn’t a factor in game 2, and played poorly in game 3. This was simply a series in which his opportunities to play were few and his chances of playing well were slim. 

Pargo played pretty well in 10 minutes in the Hawks’ game 1 win, going 2 for 4 from the floor and 1 for 2 from 3-pt range for 5 points with 1 assist. Pargo had a +/- number of -6 in the game. He assisted on the first Hawks basket of the 2nd after the C’s had gone on a mini 6-2 run to close the 1st. Then he hit a big 3 a few minutes later to end a 6-0 run by Boston that had cut the lead to single digits. In the 4th, with Boston on a 14-3 run that cut the deficit to 8 points, Pargo scored from inside to make it 69-59 with 8:26 to play. 

Pargo played just 4 minutes in game 2 and didn’t score, going 0 for 2 from the floor and 0 for 1 on 3’s, though he did grab a board. His only time on the floor was in the first 4 minutes of the 2nd quarter. He had a -3 +/- number for the game. 

In the overtime loss in game 3 Pargo played 11:27 and was totally ineffective. It showed in his +/- number for the game which was -11, the worst on the team. He had a rebound, a steal, and 2 assists, but he also turned it over twice. He went scoreless again, going 0 for 4 overall and 0 for 1 from behind the arc. 

He was 0 for 3 from the floor in the final 2 minutes of the 1st quarter, missing a jumper with 8 seconds left and another one at the buzzer. He missed from 3 early in the 2nd and then turned the ball over and was yanked for Hinrich. He reentered the game with 2 minutes left in the 3rd, and with less than 40 seconds in the quarter he turned the ball over, leading to points for the C’s and a 4-point deficit. 

He got the points back on the first possession of the 4th, stealing the ball from Rondo and dishing to Teague for a layup that tied the game. He had another assist a few minutes later on a Dampier layup that pulled the Hawks within 1. At that point Pargo had been in the game for about the last 4:40 and the Hawks were exactly where they were when he entered: 1-point behind. However, by the time he exited the game 2 minutes later the Hawks were down by 8.  

Not surprisingly, Pargo played more in game 4 than any other game, as the Hawks got blown out of the water and the game was over early in the 3rd quarter. He played 21 minutes, going 4 for 11 overall and 3 for 8 on 3’s. He scored 11 points and had 3 rebounds, 3 assists, and a steal with only 1 turnover. His +/- number for the game was -6. 

Most would assume that Pargo’s production came in junk time, as he played the entire 4th quarter when the Hawks never got closer than 20 points of the C’s. However, most of the good things Pargo did in the game came during the 1st half when the Hawks were (at least in theory) still in the game. He was 3 for 4 (2 for 3 on 3’s) with a big assist during the 1st half. He actually played terribly during mop-up (or mopped-up) time, going just 1 for 7 from the field in the 4th

Either way, coach Larry Drew must not have been too impressed with JP’s play, as Pargo did not appear in game 5, and played just 5 seconds in game 6 (the last 5 seconds of the 2nd quarter, during which Rondo tried to go in for a layup but missed, with Pargo successfully defending him). 

Moving Forward: It wouldn’t surprise me if the Hawks ended up signing Pargo again, because I have no reason to think they were disappointed in his play, and they aren’t exactly loaded with guys who can at least nominally play point guard. On the other hand, it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he signed elsewhere or went unsigned. He’s getting on in years, and he doesn’t do a whole lot for you. 


Stat Glossary


Total Stats
Games Played (GP)
Games Started (GS)
Minutes Played (MIN)
Field Goal Percentage (FG%)
Three Point Field Goal Percentage (3PT%)
Free Throw Percentage (FT%)
Field Goals Made (FGM)
Field Goal Attempts (FGA)
Three Pointers Made (3PM)
Three Point Attempts (3PA)
Free Throws Made (FTM)
Free Throw Attempts (FTA)
Two Pointers Made (2PM)
Two Point Attempts (2PA)
Two Point Field Goal Percentage (2P%)
Offensive Rebounds (OR)
Defensive Rebounds (DR)
Total Rebounds (REB)
Assists (AST)
Steals (STL)
Blocks (BLK)
Turnovers (TOV)
Personal Fouls (PF)
Points (PTS)
Flagrant Fouls (Flagrants)
Technical Fouls (Techs)
Ejections (Ejections)
Foul Outs (DQ’s)
Double-Doubles (DD)
Triple-Doubles (TD)


Per Game Stats
Minutes Per Game (MPG)
Field Goals Made Per Game (FGM/G)
Field Goal Attempts Per Game (FGA/G)
Three Pointers Made Per Game (3PM/G)
Three Point Attempts Per Game (3PA/G)
Free Throws Made Per Game (FTM/G)
Free Throw Attempts Per Game (FTA/G)
Two Pointers Made Per Game (2PM/G)
Two Point Attempts Per Game (2PA/G)
Offensive Rebounds Per Game (OR/G)
Defensive Rebounds Per Game (DR/G)
Total Rebounds Per Game (R/G)
Assists Per Game (A/G)
Steals Per Game (S/G)
Blocks Per Game (B/G)
Turnovers Per Game (TOV/G)
Points Per Game (P/G)
Personal Fouls Per Game (PF/G)


Per 48 Minute Stats
Points Per 48 Minutes (P/48)
Rebounds Per 48 Minutes (R/48)
Assists Per 48 Minutes (A/48)
Steals Per 48 Minutes (S/48)
Blocks Per 48 Minutes (B/48)
Personal Fouls Per 48 Minutes (PF/48)


Ratio Stats
Assist-to-Turnover Ratio (ATO)
Steal-to-Turnover Ratio (STO)
Steal-to-Personal Foul Ratio (SPF)
Block-to-Personal Foul Ratio (BPF)
Points Scored Per Shot Attempt (PPS)



Percentage Stats
Offensive Rebound Percentage (OR%) (% of available OR player grabbed while on floor)
Defensive Rebound Percentage (DR%) (% of available DR player grabbed while on floor)
Total Rebound Percentage (R%) (% of available REB player grabbed while on floor)
Assist Percentage (A%) (% of teammate FG’s player assisted on while on floor)
Steal Percentage (S%) (% of opp’s possessions ended with steal by player while on floor)
Block Percentage (B%) (% of opp’s 2-pt FGA’s block by player while on floor)
Turnover Percentage (TOV%) (Turnovers per 100 possessions)


Hollinger Stats
True Shooting Percentage (TS%) (Takes into account value of 2-pt, 3-pt, and FT)
Assist Ratio (ARAT) (% of possessions ended with Assist by player)
Turnover Ratio (TOVRAT) (% of possessions ended with TOV by player)
Usage Rate (USG%) (% of team plays used by player while on floor)
Player Efficiency Rating (PER) (Player’s per minute statistical rating)
Value Added (VA) (# of pts player adds to team above replacement level)
Estimated Wins Added (EWA) (# of wins player adds above replacement level)


NBA Reference.com Stats
Effective Field Goal Percentage (EFG) (Adjusts for 3-pt being worth more than 2-pt)
Offensive Rating (ORAT) (Points produced by player per 100 possessions)
Defensive Rating (DRAT) (Points allowed by player per 100 possessions)
Offensive Win Shares (OWS) (# of wins contributed by player due to offense)
Defensive Win Shares (DWS) (# of wins contributed by player due to defense)
Win Shares (WS) (# of wins contributed by player)
Win Shares Per 48 Minutes (WS/48) (# of wins contributed by player per 48 minutes)


82games.com Stats
Minutes Percentage (MIN%) (% of team minutes player was on floor)
Net Plus/Minus (+/-) (Net pts for team while player on floor)
Offensive Points Per Possession (OFF-PPP) (Team Off PPP while player on floor)
Defensive Points Per Possession (DEF-PPP) (Team Def PPP while player on floor)
Net Plus/Minus Per 48 Minutes (+/- Per 48) (Team net pts per 48 of PT for player)
On Court W-L Record (+/- W-L-T) (# of gms team outscored/didn’t outscore opponent while player was on floor)
Win Percentage (WIN%) (W-L-T in win pct form)
Net Production vs. Opponent (PRO/OPP) (How player fared vs. counterpart)
Net On Court vs. Off Court Per 48 Minutes (ON/OFF 48) (Team +/- while player on/off court per 48 minutes)
Simple Rating (SIMRAT) (Taken from combo PRO/OPP and ON/OFF 48)
Net On Court vs. Off Court Offensive Points per 100 Possessions (ON/OFF OPHP) (Team’s offensive points per 100 possessions while player on/off court)
Net On Court vs. Off Court Defensive Points per 100 Possessions (ON/OFF DPHP) (Team’s defensive points per 100 possessions while player on/off court)
Net On Court vs. Off Court Points per 100 Possessions (ON/OFF NPHP) (Team’s offensive points per 100 possessions vs. team’s defensive points per 100 possessions while player on/off court)
Clutch Situations (CLUTCH) (4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left, neither team ahead by more than 5 points)


If you’re confused about a stat or abbreviation you can check this glossary. Many of the abbreviations are ones I came up with just for shorthand. If you want further explanation/info on the stats, check out the sites listed within the glossary.


No comments: